blog 22

In order to present a valid argument, several steps must be taken. Today in class we talked about how our argument needs to be broken into five key parts to become presentable. First of all, we need the actual argument from the primary source. In my case, my argument is that science can and will eventually cross the moral line by artificially creating or resuscitating life (as seen in the episode that parallels the classic novel, Frankenstein). This argument is clearly drawn from the primary source, which is the episode “Some Assembly Required” from Buffy the Vampire Slayer. The second part of a strong argument is the evidence. I need proof that the episode is making a comparison to modern day science and a concise reference to Frankenstein. An example of my proof could be that the episode follows along with the novel, such as when Daryl lectures Chris, his brother and “creator” that he owes him a companion and he must take care of him. This is exact scene takes place in Frankenstein. The argument also needs a link, or a relationship to the real world concept. I have to state the relationship between the episode and my argument that science will one day cross the line. Secondary sources are needed as well that will explain the background of the ethical issue of resuscitation and artificial creation. I have achieved this using information I have collected on experiments around the world as well as doctor’s opinions and experiences. Lastly, I need implication. I must show how serious and what a threat my topic truly is, and imply why it is important for the reader to consider.